I would vote no, for progress

Obviously that was the Chiefs themselves messing with the clock at the end of the first half on Christmas Eve. Notice how we never heard the referee telling anyone to "reset the clock to 15 seconds"? Everyone had the right time the display was simply turned off by the man in the box to illustrate how old and out of date Arrowhead is. Ok Fine. Its old, Its Shitty, It dont work. Got it.
How bout we build you a new one. The people of KC love their Chiefs. Put out a bi-state initiative to build a new modern retractable-roof arrowhead or do a Lambeau style renovation with no roof of the old Arrowhead. Just leave the Royals out of it. Drop baseball, add in more voters on the Ks side. I bet you could get just about whatever you wanted. Oh yeah and up the Anty that the Chiefs put in. Its just a token but how about 75 or 100 million of the NFLs money.

Having said that, lets talk Royals first. Again I believe in the Bi-State option. theres just more people and if its a good plan then i believe that intelligant Kansas Citians can agree. If you have not been to Denver, Baltimore, Cleveland, or any other new modern dowtown ballpark, then go. You only need to go once, see a game one time at any of these places, to know that we should have that here in Kansas City.

I need to do some research on how much of this can be going on at the same time. Some questions I have. Has Football ever been played at Kaufman stadium or a similar structure? If the chiefs were to play even one home game outside of arrowhead what would the options be?